For some, Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 rescue plan is a ‘lifeline’ — and wouldn’t come a moment too soon


The government’s unemployment rate hovered at 6.7% in December, and the number of unemployed workers was 10.7 million.

However, the EPI argues that a breakdown of Bureau of Labor Statistics figures and other estimates based on those paint a far bleaker picture due to the business closures and public health restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic: 26.8 million workers are being negatively affected — or nearly 16% of the workforce.

This figure includes those who are misclassified as “employed, not at work” instead of unemployed (1 million), the number of officially unemployed people who have been undercounted (2.7 million), those who dropped out of the labor force (4.9 million) or are employed but experiencing a drop in hours and pay (7.5 million).

“The urgent economic priorities facing the nation are simple: Get control over the spread of the virus and then ensure that U.S. households, businesses, and governments spend and invest enough to radically reduce unemployment and boost workers’ wages,” Bivens said.

“The Biden package ticks these boxes,” Bivens added. “The continuation of enhanced pandemic-related unemployment-insurance programs, the substantial fiscal aid to state and local governments, the investments in virus control and mitigation, and the increase in the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour are all absolutely essential for rapid relief and a fast and equitable recovery.”

Some 1.2 million people applied for unemployment insurance benefits last week, up 304,000 on the previous week; that included 965,000 people who applied for regular state benefits and 284,000 who applied for pandemic unemployment assistance. Last week was also the 43rd straight week in which total initial claims were greater than in the worst week of the Great Recession.

Last week was the 43rd consecutive week total initial jobless claims were greater than the worst week of the Great Recession.

The Biden plan would serve as a lifeline, said Bivens.

Also see: The Moneyist — the ethics and etiquette of your financial affairs

Republican lawmakers advocating more restraint have signaled concern about federal budget deficits and say low interest rates obviously won’t last forever, while commentators have lamented the need for such a massive stimulus in the first place.

“The plan outlined by the president-elect is ambitious and costly, but that cost must also be viewed in the context of the combined tolls of the still raging pandemic and resulting economic damage,” Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at, said. “In failing to contain the health crisis, the economic crisis has been both lasting and deep.”

The job losses shown in the December employment report and a “heightened level of new claims for unemployment benefits and actual benefits being received all underscore the need for an extension of aid,” Hamrick added. (A recent Bankrate survey found that only 39% of Americans would or could pay an emergency expense of $1,000 or more from savings.)

Economists Peter Orszag, Robert Rubin and Joseph Stiglitz wrote in a joint paper for the Peterson Institute: “Because a robust economy benefits lower-income groups the most, particularly those previously marginalized, one should wait for more compelling evidence that further fiscal stimulus is not needed before enacting the offsets.”

“We propose a new approach in which fiscal discretion is retained but exercised after making the budget adjust more automatically and rapidly in areas where there is broad consensus that doing so is consistent with achieving broader societal goals,” they added.

For its part, the Trump White House has pointed to states’ efforts to contain the coronavirus and shuttering of businesses as the reason for the job losses in a statement released on Monday.

“As witnessed in the early days of the pandemic, employment in the leisure and hospitality industry fell by almost 50% between February and April, while employment in all other industries fell by a much smaller but still substantial 10%,” it said.

Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a bipartisan fiscal watchdog, told CNN: “It seems quite premature to say we need another $2 trillion now given what we just passed,” but she added “we probably need to do more borrowing before it’s time to pivot away.”

People are, of course, suffering economically. At the height of the pandemic in March, more than 30 million Americans were laid off or furloughed when the economy shut down to curb the spread of COVID-19. The unemployment rate at that point was 14.7%; it has since come down to 6.7%. The leisure and hospitality industries have been particularly hit hard by the pandemic.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average
S&P 500
 and Nasdaq Composite
 had a tumultuous 2020, but they were marginally higher Thursday as investors weighed the likelihood of a more generous stimulus under Biden amid increased risk of more political unrest after the siege on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump last week.

President-elect Biden is calling on Congress to provide the $160 billion for a national vaccination program.

Analysts expect the markets to react positively to the news of Biden’s rescue plan on Friday. “To support the spending and investment needed to fully repair the labor market, we estimated in early December that roughly $3 trillion was needed,” Bivens added.

“Less than one-third of this amount was included in the end-of-year recovery package, and the Biden administration’s proposal fills in the remaining amount. In short, it is a proposal that is driven by careful consideration of the evidence and is not artificially constrained by outdated fears about federal debt,” he added.

“This marks a welcome break from mistakes made in past downturns, such as the Great Recession. It is critical that the incoming Biden administration and Congress work to pass this important relief and recovery measure,” Bivens concluded.

Another factor buoying up markets. There has been progress on vaccines — which, assuming they work, could eventually bring people back to their place of work. President-elect Biden is calling on Congress to provide the $160 billion for a national vaccination program, “expand testing, mobilize a public health jobs program, and take other necessary steps to build capacity to fight the virus,” according to a statement issued Thursday evening by his transition team.

BioNTech SE
and Pfizer
said a final analysis of their vaccine candidate showed 95% efficacy. Meanwhile, Moderna
 said its own candidate was 94.5% effective. A vaccine candidate from AstraZeneca
 and the University of Oxford also showed an average efficacy of 70% in a pooled analysis of interim data, according to a peer-reviewed study published last week. That’s about the same level of protection as a flu vaccine.

Biden, meanwhile, pledged to forge ahead with a massive stimulus package when he takes office in a government with a Democratic-controlled House and Senate.

“While Congress’s bipartisan action in December was a step in the right direction, it was only a down payment. It fell far short of the resources needed to tackle the immediate crisis,” the statement by his transition team added. “We are in a race against time, and absent additional government assistance, the economic and public health crises could worsen in the months ahead; schools will not be able to safely reopen; and vaccinations will remain far too slow.”

“As last month’s jobs report underscored, the virus and our economy are intertwined,” the statement announcing the $1.9 trillion rescue package added. “We cannot rescue our economy without containing this virus.”


Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.